Old 03-23-2011, 11:52 PM   #1
Ben's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Three Rivers Station, Meekatharra
Posts: 70
Post Paper- Carbon in the semi-arid mulga lands

Carbon sequestration and biodiversity restoration potential of semi-arid mulga lands of Australia interpreted from long-term grazing exclosures

G. Bradd Witta, Michelle V. Noëla, Michael I Bird, R.J.S.(Bob) Beetona, Neal W. Menzies

Limited data regarding soil carbon (C) sequestration potential and biosequestration potential in arid and semi-arid environments is an impediment to appropriate policy formulation directed at greenhouse gas abatement. This paper assesses the terrestrial C biosequestration and biodiversity restoration potential of the semi-a arid mulga lands of eastern Australia by measuring above and below ground C, and by making floristic biodiversity assessments in old grazing exclosures.

Grazing exclusion increased water infiltration rates and water retention capacity in the soil. Exclosures also had increased herbaceous cover and decreased bareground. Biodiversity benefits included higher species richness and increased abundance of native grasses, many of which have become locally rare under increased grazing pressure.

The study indicates that in the absence of grazing, soil and above ground biomass, when combined, has potential carbon sequestration rates of between 0.92 and 1.1t CO2-e ha−1 year−1 over a period of approximately 40 years. The contribution to these figures from soil C sequestration is approximately 0.18t CO2-e ha−1 year−1, with above ground biomass contributing an additional 0.73–0.91 tCO2-e ha−1 year−1. If 50% of eastern Australia’s mulgalands (half of 25.4 million ha) were managed for C sequestration and biodiversity through the control of all herbivores, then annual sequestration rates could reach between 11.6 and 14Mt CO2-e year−1 which is between 2and 2.5% of Australia’s annual emissions. The potential to sequester carbon and improve biodiversity out comes in extensive semi arid grazing lands will require significant policy shifts to encourage and reward necessary landuse change.

© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Ben is offline WA Australia   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2011, 07:40 PM   #2
Gus Whyte
Junior Member
Gus Whyte's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wentworth
Posts: 4
Default Short term

I agree with the paper and this does work in the short term <10 years, as the environment changes management needs to change too. Perrenial grasses are disturbance dependant, so only remove grazing long term from country that you don't want perrenial grasses. Science says that grasses remove more carbon than trees, so I know what I'm doing.
Gus Whyte is offline NSW Australia   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +9.5. The time now is 03:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS
Grazebook © 2011